|
Hmmm... what duckznutz has just posted seems to backs up my proposal that homosexuality was social, and was also non-exclusive. Except that he goes so far as to suggest that physical homosexual acts didn't even occur, that it was simply male-bonding.
Again, I can't claim to know one way or the other, which is why I would be interesteding in the evidence for and against.
I also wish to clarify a point I made earlier about my repulsion towards homosexual sex. I must emphasise that I am repulsed by homosexual sex involving me. I am not repulsed by the act of homosexual sex. If a male homosexual sex scene were to come on during a movie that I was watching, while I would not be sexually aroused, I would not be "grossed out".
I know that the same is not true for many people. For many people, the mere thought of male homosexual sex is disgusting. THIS I believe is where the social distortion comes into play. That the people who are disgusted by homosexual sex are the ones who are victims of cultural conditioning. I do however believe that an adversion to finding yourself in a homosexual situation is completely natural for a hetrosexual, in the same way that a predilection to finding yourself in a hetrosexual situation is natural.
__________________
|