Quote:
Originally posted by monody
well- here's a different take:
why is a person's reproductive capabilities such a large consideration in their sociological placement? if it is such a huge factor, why wouldn't adults who have chosen not to have children be as shunned as the gay community?
|
Well . . have you not noticed that adults who do not have children ARE in fact considered to be 'lesser' than those who do?
How many mothers (and it is usually mothers!) constantly nag their unmarried children into 'settling down' (a euphemism for producing children) . . . . . . . . . and how many dinner parties have you attended where the couple with no children are constantly asked "so no plans to start a family then?"
I very carefully stated that homosexuals add nothing to society
by virtue of their homosexuality . . . . we all pay taxes, we all contribute equally . . . heterosexuals (who produce children) ALSO extend the fabric and network of humanity into the future . . . . . . that is why they will ALWAYS be considered as 'superior' (cant think of a better word sorry!) to any other relationship.
Its not "Woman and children first!" for nothing.