Quote:
Originally posted by geep
The problem with this Supreme Court edict is that it's based on a right to privacy which is noticeably undefined in the Constitution. Nowhere in the constitution is it mentioned, specifically. The closest mention it gets is in Amendment X:
|
i have to disagree on that.
the closest thing would be the ninth. which says just cuz a liberty is not mentioned in constitution/bill of rights, it doesnt mean that it doesnt exist.
so, guarenteed liberties could exist, but it doesnt necessarily have to be stated.