Pacifier

Yes, but we made it look like we were attacked.
So the Third Reich could label the invasion as "defence"

Erm, Saddam has no connetions to the al kaida how can he be responsible for their crimes?
I guess you have no conections to the Mafia, but with your logic you are guilty for their crimes.

full scale war is not a way to act against terrorism.
4000+ dead afghan civillians are not a way to defend terrorism, the root of terror is hate. Do you think by killing civilians you will make this hate disappear? do you think the people will now love you? you bombed them to shreds, where unable to install a goverment, helped the old warlords back into power and you really belive that the people down there will thank you?

Like I said in an other thread, if you go to war think about how you would like to end before you start it! I do not see how the USA has done that, they still seem to think that a shitload of bombs will solve everything.

we have forgotten so many graves in some odd deserts, do you want a war against all those nations? should I list you a few?

A good step to begin with would have been to be honest, to say
"hey, we want to stop saddam from killing his own people, we have a plan to remove him AND a plan to install a democratic goverment"
but you used faked, or 12 year old reports. you send you soldiers to war for a lie. you whole nation was tricked into this. Like someone said: 30% of the americans belive that you have found WMDs, they believe a lie.

__________________
"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death
— Albert Einstein