You're getting the "all treated equally" concept the wrong - t more pertains to the concept that if killing is wrong - then noone deserves death - and two wrongs don't make a right.
Examples agaisnt what you say - if someone commits manslaughter (involunatry killing) do they deserve to me involuntarliy killed back? Or if someone develops a sickness that can br treated, but is gone unnoticed - and hurts someone, they deserve the same, if their illness would be solved by simple medication?
I think you should study some more Ghandi. Right now the premise you're working off of seems a little weak.
|