Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

cchris · 06-20-2003, 03:20 AM

I came across this and found it interesting to say the least.
Posted only to see viewpoints expressed and as an item of importance in history.

A fully searchable online edition of the largest body of texts detailing the lives of non-elite people ever published, containing accounts of over 100,000 criminal trials held at London's central criminal court.

........................................................................................................
The period from 1674 to 1834 witnessed the transformation of policing in London from a system reliant on private individuals and part-time officials for apprehending criminals to the development of salaried officials and semi-official "thief-takers", and eventually a modern professionalised police system. In the process the mechanisms by which the people tried at the Old Bailey were identified and apprehended was radically transformed, and ultimately brought under the control of the state.

Non Compos Mentis
Defendants could argue in their defence that they were not responsible for the crime, owing to the fact that they were not of sound mind, and therefore could not be held responsible for their actions. In order for this argument to be accepted, the defendant had to have a total lack of reason and understanding, to be totally unable to understand the difference between right and wrong. Jurors accepted this argument in approximately half the cases in which it was made, leading to this verdict. After 1800 the standards applied in such cases became less rigorous, and acquittal rates increased. For example, it became accepted that even if a crime was rationally planned, the defendant could still be found not guilty if he didn't understand right from wrong. In a small number of such trials medical testimony was provided.

ON THIS DAY IN 1737.
Hans MacConnel allegedly murdered a woman and child by nearly cutting their heads off.

.........................................................................................................

The Proceedings of the Old Bailey London

06-20-2003, 03:20 AM	#1 (permalink)
cchris Junkie Location: Sydney	Policing in London before the Bobbies I came across this and found it interesting to say the least. Posted only to see viewpoints expressed and as an item of importance in history. A fully searchable online edition of the largest body of texts detailing the lives of non-elite people ever published, containing accounts of over 100,000 criminal trials held at London's central criminal court. ........................................................................................................ The period from 1674 to 1834 witnessed the transformation of policing in London from a system reliant on private individuals and part-time officials for apprehending criminals to the development of salaried officials and semi-official "thief-takers", and eventually a modern professionalised police system. In the process the mechanisms by which the people tried at the Old Bailey were identified and apprehended was radically transformed, and ultimately brought under the control of the state. Non Compos Mentis Defendants could argue in their defence that they were not responsible for the crime, owing to the fact that they were not of sound mind, and therefore could not be held responsible for their actions. In order for this argument to be accepted, the defendant had to have a total lack of reason and understanding, to be totally unable to understand the difference between right and wrong. Jurors accepted this argument in approximately half the cases in which it was made, leading to this verdict. After 1800 the standards applied in such cases became less rigorous, and acquittal rates increased. For example, it became accepted that even if a crime was rationally planned, the defendant could still be found not guilty if he didn't understand right from wrong. In a small number of such trials medical testimony was provided. ON THIS DAY IN 1737. Hans MacConnel allegedly murdered a woman and child by nearly cutting their heads off. ......................................................................................................... The Proceedings of the Old Bailey London __________________ There's a fine line between participation and mockery Last edited by cchris; 06-20-2003 at 03:25 AM..