Quote:
|
So it's only killin' that counts, huh? Oh, well. Please ask your specialist if any of what he said is locale-dependant, and in what way. IANAL.
|
It is, though it's irrelevant to the situation. What is relevant is the self-defense claim, which is obviously not true. If you don't wish to accept this as fact or are unable to for various reasons, then there is no logical argument here.
Quote:
|
In Texas, for instance, you can pursue to reclaim stolen goods. Address that.
|
Intuitively I doubt this includes unreasonable force. Althought I must ask that you quit bringing up irrelevant points. This happened in Arizone, not Texas.
And if you are acknowledging he did pursue them, then you must also acknowledge that this was not self-defense. He was in no danger when he crushed their vehicle.
This wasn't self-defense. You can be in denial all you want, but as it stands you have no logical argument.
Until you come up with something that makes sense, I will not be replying.