|
I see as both sexes being as intuitive as they will allow themselves to be. It boils down to certain complacency to having fake conversations.
This is where Person A states something.
Person B knows person A is not being 100% real (lying, manipulating, asking a question they know the answer to, etc)
Person A knows that person B knows
Person B knows that person A knows that person B knows they know
and yet they go through the motions for multiple reasons based on programs they've learned early on
Have you ever been engaged in conversation with a person you really didn’t want to be standing there talking to? Upon parting you say "I'll give you a call" and they other person says "OK, see ya" both of you know you wont call and yet both of you went through the motions.
In arguments someone knows what they've done to offend; deep down inside they know, but the dishonesty with themselves is so convincing the autopilot makes it a reality. That could stem back to 1st grade instilling if we don’t have the right answer were a failure.
The question is if everyone walked around with a Liar Liar (Jim Carey movie- where he couldn’t lie) scenario the honesty would be refreshing, but would the lack of games be the end of millions of relationships?
I probably didn’t make a bit of sense to anyone-sorry.
This is actually one of the many philosophies of Andrew Carnegie.
__________________
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking
|