|
again, ace, you dodge the main point. your ideology has been a failure. it's been implemented. so your positions are irrelevant. so it is of no real consequence what your relation to the assumptions particular to that framework are.
i'm not interested in changing you. i am sometimes interested in demolishing the stupid arguments you make because, at the time i write posts, it amuses me to do it. and it would be nice to demolish your arguments so thoroughly that you cannot continue. that would make me laugh.
but like i've said before, arguing with you is like playing chess with a six year old. there's no challenge and it's not interesting.
what might be interesting--for once--is a justification for your continued adherence to an ideology that's produced such fiasco where it's been implemented. and don't waste time getting all purist about it---"o it hasn't **really** been implemented"---the usual line of trotskyites who are as rigid about their orthodoxy as you are about yours.
as for the debt ceiling debacle--engineered by people who think as you do because they imagine there's some political benefit that can accrue to them if they can make people forget that the crisis is fake, really, and that such problems as there are and will come of it are the result of an entirely cynical political calculation---it's astonishing to me that given your seeming years of repeating exactly the same things--alternating from time to time with yet another stupid, homespun analogy notable only for the trigonometry that's required to connect them with whatever you imagine your point to be---is that you have the audacity to make pronouncements about compromise.
i know i know--blah blah blah leadership because really all you heroic individuals are submissives and just want a presidential daddy to take you over his knee and smack your ass until you say yes yes daddy yes.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|