i am really not seeing the logic that connects f&f to anything remotely like the pet general conspiracy theories of the ultra-right. it seems to me that dc is referring quite specifically to what actually is the case and that most of the responses are kind of dissociative. the only one that offers substantive information is dunedan's post above, and even there while i understand the points, i don't see either what holds them together in a sequence or what connects them to the ultra-right talking points.
edit---kir stang i understand....showing that it's possible to be concerned about gun rights and still make sense (thanks, sir...these things can be tiring)
can someone walk me through the steps?
or should i watch faux news to see what the dots are and how they're being filled in? because it smells of ailes. and if that's the case, the realities involved are secondary to the political usage of this obviously ill-advised operation as yet another stick to beat on the effigy of the obama administration with and from there to keep ultra-right wing identity politics appearing like it's coherent. but that's always the agenda these days.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|