View Single Post
Old 07-18-2011, 03:12 PM   #30 (permalink)
dksuddeth
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
I dont want to limit any legal citizens rights. I want to give the ATF the tools they need so they dont turn to reckless operations to attempt to stop (but botch) the flow of straw purchases.
as was said months ago, this wasn't reckless, this was felony stupid. The gun dealers KNEW these sales were shady and didn't want to proceed, but were encouraged to do so BY THE ATF!! how the hell does that law then not have enough teeth to stop it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
Under what law can ATF build a case if they have reasonable suspicion and if the person in question signs a form indicating that the 60+ AK-47s are for personal use...and they dont track the weapons beyond that person?

Or what is wrong with having dealers report multiple sales of long arms in the same manner as hand guns?
From the article you posted below:

Quote:
But court decisions have made this “straw buyer” charge difficult to prove and judges often don’t take it seriously. The issue has been highlighted in recent months by both U.S. Attorneys posted along the border and the Justice Department’s inspector general.
I'd like to see the actual decisions for this, but i'm going to assume that it's difficult to prove because you're not committing a real crime. Only the transfer itself would be a crime, and even THAT is questionable.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux View Post
So the testimony of, or concerns expressed by, the ATF agents is not relevant?

Or the concerns expressed by the ATF agents in this article...
Weak laws, paltry resources hinder gun trafficking probes, say ATF backers | iWatch News

...because you dont like the publisher?

But I should accept everything the NRA says?

It gets tiresome to hear that any law enforcement officials suggesting the need for stricter laws to address illegal trafficking lack credibility.
it's also getting tiring to see people refuse to acknowledge that these sales COULD have been stopped, but were encouraged to proceed anyway just so more laws could be made to further limit the peoples right to own guns.

and one more time, i'm not a NRA member, nor am I a fan. I've never said anyone should accept what the NRA says, in fact, they are about 4 months LATE for this whole scandal.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360