So, I'm confused. I mean, I'm into the hardcore thing in my actual sex life (not all the time, but more often than not) and have had about an 80% return rate from partners. That means the women I was banging were into it... into all those horrible, despicable, degrading things that objectify them as fuck puppets and blah-blah-blah. Kinda funny, actually. I got the ridiculous "Why do you look at porn? You can't look at porn!" psychobabble guilt trip lecture from numerous girlfriends that were completely okay with me parking it in their ass and glazing whatever part of their anatomy I felt like frosting at the moment of my Van Halen-style Eruption. Most of the girls I've been with don't watch porn (around me), but they're cool with "running the gauntlet."
As far as amateur porn, are we talking about production values or what? This certainly isn't necessarily about the people and the activity. I've seen plenty of amateur couples engage in "mainstream" hardcore sex acts such as acrobatic pile driver positions, baby batter face painting and plundering the alternate love canal. Is it more acceptable because Joe and Jane Smith are doing it because they're in a relationship and they have visible zits and stretch marks? Maybe. I prefer watching real people, myself. They're normal, "imperfect" and I can identify with that. Maybe that is why we all like amateur porn. We don't feel so inadequate, even if we know the thing we are comparing ourselves to is completely ridiculous such as a body builder with a cock the size of a loaf of bread or a skinny cokehead blond with perfect tits and smooth hamstrings so tight you can bounce a quarter off them.
So, basically, people are full of shit. Men are putting up with consuming the cartoon drivel that is super gonzo porn (or being brainwashed into seeing the people and activities as run-of-the-mill) and women are pretending that they're okay with the same kind of hardcore that men are into because its edgy and progressive or whatever. Newsflash: Men and women aren't the same. If men and women had the same type of sexual motivation, rappers and other Top 40 crooners would be out of a job, people. Call me a cromag, but I'm quite certain heterosexual fuck sessions typically involve a dude putting his penis inside some part of a woman. He pitches, she catches. The physical part supports the psychological part. No matter what position we're in, sex with my girlfriend involves her getting plowed. It's basic math, right? Controversial, sure, but you can't really argue with the body parts.
...
Ugh, I need another beer.
Last edited by Plan9; 06-30-2011 at 02:15 PM..
|