Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
...I would suggest you do more home work on the subject, my gut tells me that you hang up on what amounts to a trivial difference precludes your understanding of the full consequences of what you support.
Again, you don't get it. If I give you an example to try to help you understand - I get your standard come back.
For those who do get it - promoting social welfare is directly related to supporting those in political power who share similar views on social welfare. It is an exercise in nothingness to have a social welfare agenda and not be politically active. If you want to save the whales, you support those in politics who want to save the whales. If you want to end racial discrimination, you support those in political power who want to end racism. Smart people will study the rules of the game and play that game to win....
|
ace, I've been working for (c)(3)s and (c)(4)s for 20+ years, depending on whether I was on the lobbying side or the research/program side. I do know a little something about how they work and what restrictions are involved.
And I am still appalled but not surprised that you would try to rationalize campaign contributions solely to one party as a non-partisan social welfare activity.