aceventura3

I believe my problem is in the way the term is used by you and others. It often does not fit the text book definition when it it used here. I also suspect when you use the term you are referring to one thing and when others use it they are referring to something else.

This is a discussion board it is very appropriate to ask people to clarify the terms and concepts being used.


You do not know what I do and what I don't do within the context of a question.

I often start reading something you write or something written by a source you provide, and if it clearly starts off with a faulty premise I will usually stop reading in detail and scan the remaining looking for some rationale for the faulty premise, as I did in the article you most recently cited here. Your guy is clearly wrong and did not provide any support for his faulty premise. The laziness is on his part and on your part - he could have very easily presented an accurate characterization of the economic crisis and went on to his other points - but he did not and you got caught providing something you did not vet. Before making your charges against others, look in a mirror.

In my first response I stated what the problem with the article was, you have refused to address that and instead direct attacks toward me personally. Be careful, I may breakout a series of analogies or start responding with my dry uninspired humor.

Or, even sarcasm.

Have a nice day.

__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."