Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
No, ace.
It is more you like mis-characterizing the legislation and demonstrating a lack of understanding of the difference between legislation (setting general goals) and regulation (setting specific standards).
|
I have been specifically stating my concerns regarding the administrator of the EPA having the power to regulate CO2 emissions, the legislation addresses that, and I suggest that Congress clearly define their intent on the issue of CO2 emissions. Your comment above is vague.
Quote:
|
Beyond that, what the EPA is doing is its job of implementing the Clean Air Act...the law that the US Supreme Court ruled in 07 that the Bush Administration willfully ignored.
|
I never stated that EPA did not have the authority. I have stated that I think the EPA has too much power and I have concerns regarding how that power can be used. Again, I would like Congress to address the concerns, not just held by me but many others as well.
Quote:
|
You should really try to understand the process better before falsely characterizing or misrepresenting it.
|
Can you be more specific? What have I said about the power held by the EPA that is incorrect? I actually posted a summary of the legislation, but what have I said about it that has not been correct? I admit I am not an expert and if there is an opportunity for me to learn, I am open to it. If I have mis-read the legislation, I am open to being corrected. I am not open to ad hominem argument.