jinn, you said
Quote:
|
I don't think there's a really solid rationale for allowing *physical* resistance to unlawful arrest by a uniformed police officer in the 21st century.
|
and since this has always been a clearly established common law right since 1215, what else did you say or should I safely assume?
the framers of the constitution clearly wrote the 4th Amendment to prevent the government agents from entering private property without a warrant or clearly outlined exigent circumstances, so how is agreeing with this ruling anything but being comfortable with the courts removing rights?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|