Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Does not change the reality in many of our urban centers of 55% plus black young male unemployment. Over the past 50 years the liberal message to young black males has been that Corporate America is racist, evil, wants to exploit you and Republican are their advocate. The liberal solution is no solution. The liberal message is false. The liberal approach has harmed every generation of young black males in my life time.
But as usual, you respond to the messenger and not the message.
|
What have Republicans done to help young black males that didn't involve trickling?
---------- Post added at 05:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:37 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Do you think the data is biased?
|
I haven't seen the data. But now I know who contracted its generation.
Quote:
If industry wants to train and employ people is there a problem with that?
|
Is this a rhetorical question?
Quote:
The problem is the nanny state. Minimum wage and some (not all) other employment legislation benefits some at the expense of others. Is that statement true or false in your view? And if true, who wins and who loses with minimum wage legislation?
|
The problem with the nanny state, however, is that it give disproportionate support to businesses vs. the lower/working class. There is a long history of that.
That said, most if not all legislation benefits one party at the expense of another; if it weren't the case, the condition(s) probably wouldn't need to be legislated in the first place.
Bullshit.
Speculation usually does more harm than good, especially since so much of it would be more aptly labelled "gambling."