It just seems to me that this is not the best case to test a state's permit law, given the fact that the guy did not apply for a permit, raising the issue of whether or not he had standing (the Md court said he did not).
The Supreme Court has a long history of being reluctant to take on 2nd Amendment cases and this would be an easy one to deny cert based on the issue of standing rather than having to address the constitutionality of the Md law.
But. I'm not an attorney.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
|