Originally Posted by aceventura3

The UN mandate has been violated.



would people in the Obama administration be willing to say under oath, subject to the penalty of perjury that there is and have been no US military troops on the ground? Would they testify that no Nato troops, with US knowledge and approval, have not been and are not on the ground, in violation of the UN mandate?



I am a defender of executive power, you on the other hand have consistently been on the other-side of the argument, but for some reason not now. Pleas explain.



Why? Is it not clear that the argument could be made? Do you not understand those arguments? Again, why play juvenile games? If you want to seriously discuss the issues involving the real possibility that the UN mandate has been violated, first can you acknowledge that reasonable people can even make the argument? If your assumption is that I am just making stuff up because I don't like Obama nothing that follows will matter.