[Links are allowed, but you need to have a minimum number of posts on the forum first. This is to dissuade spammers. You should be able to post links after 10 posts, just be sure to follow the rules (no spamming, advertising). PM me if you have any problems with posting links after 10 posts. You're currently sitting at 6.]
Okay, for starters, honour killings will never be legal in the U.S., so that's not really worthy of discussion.
Second, if people like McCain aren't "real" Republicans, can you tell me what the base requirements are from being one?
Third, how are these people appeasing "bloodthirsty Muslims" exactly?
Are you talking about this?
Quote:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told CBS’s Bob Schieffer on Sunday that some members of Congress were considering some kind of action in response to the Florida Quran burning that sparked a murderous riot at a United Nations complex in Afghanistan and other mayhem.
“Ten to 20 people have been killed,” Reid said on “Face the Nation,” but refused to say flat-out that the Senate would pass a resolution condemning pastor Terry Jones.
“We’ll take a look at this of course…as to whether we need hearings or not, I don’t know,” he added.
|
Reid: 'We'll look into' Quran burning - POLITICO Live - POLITICO.com
And this?
Quote:
|
I wish we could find a way to hold people accountable. Free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war. During World War II, we had limits on what you could say if it would inspire the enemy.
|
Lindsey Graham On Koran Burning: “Freedom Of Speech Is A Great Idea But We’re In A War.”
Are your comments about how to respond to the Quran burning? Or whether to respond at all?