Quote:
Originally Posted by longliveusa
1. the Constitution forbids the government from keeping Americans from owning guns.
|
That's not in dispute here.
Quote:
2. the Militia movement has nothing to do with any racism or oppression
|
Are you a spokesperson for "The Militia"? Are you aware that some militia members are likely to be racist and view their cause as resisting oppression?
Nothing is a strong word, and in this case, I think it's false.
Quote:
3 Americans have the right to Change the government when the government is destructive to our freedom.
|
This is really vague. What does "destructive to our freedom" really mean? Anyway, that's not really being disputed either.
Quote:
4.America is a constitutional republic
|
Yes, a democratic presidential system, right? Yeah, I'm a bit familiar with it. What about it?
Quote:
5. christian identify is not a Militia the kkk is not a Militia
|
Are there Christians or KKK members within militias?
Quote:
6. slandering people who are experts at living at living off the land does not make your point come across as being logical
|
What slander? Whose point?
Quote:
7 the SLPC is run by CAIR which had a reporter fired who voted for Obama just cause he questioned islam.
|
Source? Point?
* * * * *
In other news, there's this fascinating tidbit from Fox News:
Quote:
Is Fox Regular Michael Scheuer Arguing That Armed Revolution May Be Necessary In The U.S.?
April 01, 2011 12:49 am ET by Adam Shah
On Fox Business' Freedom Watch, host Andrew Napolitano hosted Fox regular and former CIA official Michael Scheuer to discuss President Obama's actions in Libya. Out of nowhere, Scheuer began ranting about taxes and spending and said: "It really points to the wisdom of the Founders in putting the Second Amendment into place as a guard against arbitrary, ridiculous government."
That's a dangerous mix of right-wing talking points. Scheuer managed (again, with no prompting whatsoever) to go off on a "tax-and-spend" rant against a Democratic administration and then immediately bring up the Second Amendment right to bear arms. It's hard to interpret Scheuer's comments as anything other than an argument that people may need to arm themselves to overthrow the Obama administration if things continue down this road.
[Embedded video on article main page]
NAPOLITANO: Can you look at this and say, "There they go again. The government of the United States thinks that it can instill a western Jeffersonian democracy in a part of the planet that has never come anywhere close to ideas like that and they think they can instill it with force and they think they can instill with it American bloodshed"?
SCHEUER: Yeah, that's exactly what's going on, Judge. The president's running out of time here. The resistance is going to get beat without boots on the ground. You know, they involved us in unnecessary wars. They tax us to death. They spend us into oblivion. It really points to the wisdom of the Founders in putting the Second Amendment into place as a guard against arbitrary, ridiculous government. And keep in mind that Scheuer once stated that "[t]he only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States." Scheuer has also said that "we're not killing enough people" in Afghanistan and that Democratic administrations are "pro-terrorist." He has also launched numerous personal attacks on President Obama, stating that Obama "obviously does not care" about "protecting Americans" and calling him a "coward." And Scheuer has said that Obama's "arrogance and racism" will get "more of our kids killed in wars."
|
Is Fox Regular Michael Scheuer Arguing That Armed Revolution May Be Necessary In The U.S.? | Media Matters for America