View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 06:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
I dug up this article. Though, I'm sure there are international jurisdictions for this sort of thing.

Quote:
Can you say anything about the dead?
By Duncan Walker
BBC News

Lurid claims about Princess Diana have made the front pages once again. But what are the restrictions on what you can say about people who have died?

Princess Diana, as everyone now knows, had a colourful life. Yet eight years after her death, stories - often from "close friends and acquaintances" - continue to fuel biographies and newspaper headlines.

This week alone has seen claims that Diana slept with JFK Jnr within hours of meeting him, "in a moment of pure lust". The Kennedy heir's performance, says her alternative therapist Simone Simmons, was worthy of a 10.

First among the usual considerations that an author, such as Ms Simmons, would face when wanting to make explosive claims about people is that of libel. But in recounting her allegations about Diana and Kennedy, both famously dead, the lawyers need not be involved at all.

As the saying goes, "you can't libel the dead". So does that mean hypothetically one could say anything one wanted about someone who had died?

'Analysing history'


The problem for families upset by claims about their dead relatives is that "you can't stop history", says media lawyer Duncan Lamont of solicitors Charles Russell.


“ Of their dead relative, there are no circumstances under which a family could sue for libel ”
Duncan Lamont - media lawyer

While the living can fight tooth and nail to keep their good name, there is little that can be done - in England and Wales at least - once they have passed on.

"You can't protect reputations in perpetuity because it would harm the prospects of analysing history," says Mr Lamont.

For example, the laws of libel would allow Winston Churchill to sue anyone who claimed that he was racist during his lifetime, but they could not be used to stop historians making such claims after his death.

Put simply, the laws of libel are intended to protect only the living against unjustified attacks on their reputation. "Of their dead relative, there are no circumstances under which a family could sue for libel," says Mr Lamont.

'Saving' prostitutes

There are some routes of action which aggrieved families can sometimes take, though.

One example is when the family of the former prime minister William Gladstone took exception to claims that he liked to cavort with prostitutes.

"One version was that he would sleep with them, another is that he would try to save them," says Mr Lamont.

Despite gossip about his unusual habits before his death in 1898, it was not until they were published in 1927 that action was taken. The family called author Peter Wright a liar, which caused him to sue them. Unable to prove the allegations, the writer lost the case - showing that even if you can't libel the dead you can still be provoked into a foolhardy defence of your own reputation.

False claims

The living can also take action when the claims against the deceased have knock-on effects against them. For example, if a newspaper were to claim the deceased committed crimes with members of their family, the family could sue.

Action could also be taken on the grounds of malicious falsehood - where a claim survives for the benefit of the estate. For example, should an article falsely claim that the death of a person meant their business had closed, the estate could sue if the piece was intended to damage the firm and it did so.

Lord Lucan

For those writers who manage to steer away from any tales which libel or otherwise harm the living, one area of danger remains - the undead.

It is not as unusual as some might think for reports of a death to be a little premature.

Earlier this year a man feared to have been killed by the Asian tsunami after telling friends and family he was taking a three month holiday in Thailand turned up safe and well in a British prison.

Should the likes of the much-maligned Lord Lucan turn up alive it could mean many a difficult day in court for the UK's newspaper editors.
BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | Can you say anything about the dead?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360