roachboy

1. pedantic horseshit aside, you concede the point. fine.

2. right. so the talking points were taken from you. fox is repeating you. i hope you're getting the royalties you so richly deserve.

3. you're being obtuse.

4, i am well aware of the time-line that's involved with this conflict to now.
your interpretation is pulled from the air.
what it's probably based on is the flip of it. which is circular. to wit: the un intervened to prevent a massacre. had that intervention not happened, there would have been one. ergo, the rebels would have lost "from the start"------so you can't even account for the fact of the intervention. so why are you bothering to talk about this situation in libya at all?


5. speaking of time-lines, maybe you ought to review actual material about the speed with which this situation tanked. the resolution was pushed through extremely fast. but you seem "honest" in that special way--chronology is important when you think it suits some purpose, and is irrelevant when it doesn't. fast and loose with the facts as always.

if you actually bothered to read the article i posted above---which you clearly did not---you'd have an alternative scenario. but why bother reading?

"leadership"---->meaningless b-school meme. we've been through this too. over and over. good christ. no learning curve at all.

__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite