View Single Post
Old 03-24-2011, 07:07 PM   #176 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru View Post
I'm not so sure about this. When you have the GOP strongarming and ramming this through the process, there isn't much time to go courting a media that may or may not be willing to give a platform of debate or protest. The process itself came undone, and so leaving the state became a last-ditch effort to create a stall to what they viewed as an undemocratic process.

Is this really the case? Is there evidence of this or a precedent?

Would you say unions have become more gluttonous or less gluttonous than corporate management? Public management?
Unlike the federal Congress where the minority party can filibuster or use other rules to require super-majorities for passage of legislation, most state legislatures provide little in the way of rights for the minority party.

And, Lincoln, when he was a state senator, reportedly was one of the first to use the tactic the Democrats used in Wisconsin to prevent the legislature from voting on a particular bill.

In Wisconsin, a state judge has issued a temporary hold on the legislation that effectively busts the public sector unions, alleging that the Republicans may have acted illegally in passing the law by violating the state open meeting law.

The recent trend by Republican governors and legislators to bust the public sector unions wont carry over to the private sector. Federal law protects the rights of workers in private companies to unionize.

As to unions being PACs for the Democrats, perhaps that is because the Democrats are generally more representative of the rights of the working class.

And, still corporate PACs outspend union PACs by about 3:1.

---------- Post added at 11:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood View Post
There is a new GOP sponsored House Bill that says (in part) that if an able-bodied worker goes on strike, that worker's family members (spouse, kids, dependents) would be ineligible for food stamps.

Why do working class people vote for a party that openly hates them?
Since the Republicans in Congress cant directly bust private sector unions, they found another cheap tactic.

It wont see the light of day, but it still says alot about their priorities.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360