|
I'm going to have a hard time caring about the third one given the abortion of "facts" that made up the first one. I even came as a supportive audience, in that I tended to agree with their presentation of Christianity not being unique historically. However, I started to notice glaring factual errors in an effort to line them all up under one point, which was followed by absolutely ridiculous conspiracy and myth to justify further arguments about money, 9/11 and the Illuminati. If the producer of the first has anything to do with the third, I suspect it'll be similarly vague and fact-less.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
|