|
"Don't shoot the messenger. Take aim at the masters."
True enough, baraka_guru. A large part of what I do involves science. I must admit to a deep anti-religious bias - mostly the kind of blind faith that supports religion. My issue with science, in general, is that it has become the new blind-faith religion of our time.
There are serious flaws with the scientific method, to be sure... From ontological/epistemological flaws, such as those that are hiding in the OP, regarding the repeatability of conditions, and others - especially what is called "peer review" - now there's a religion-of-science biased congregation who are heavily invested in the status quo enough to reflexively throw stones at unorthodox approaches.
You know, the first 40 millennia of human technological progress, the great migrations, civilizations, the pyramids, the Gothic cathedrals, and so much more, were not products of the scientific method. Without the acknowledgement of mind, as well as the inclusion of many-valued logic, indeterminacy, relativity, and non-repeatability into the very fabric of the current method, we will surely be brought headlong into the Matrix, by the current crop of mind-blind scientists.
__________________
create evolution
|