Stick to the question at hand. We can speculate all we want about what the other reasons might be for the rejection of their application to adopt. Frankly I don't care to do this other than to acknowledge that there may be other reasons.
The fact remains that the OP was set up to discuss whether or not being different, and in this case specifically vegetarian, should be grounds for refusing the application to adopt. I think we have clearly shown that being a vegetarian is not sufficient ground to reject an application for adoption. Introducing other possibilities is not relevant to the question.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
|