|
I'm sorry, but I don't see how you can come to this conclusion based on the fact the couple is suing the government.
They think they are fit to adopt and don't want to compromise their own way of living, because they see nothing wrong with it.
They actually might have point in being discriminated against compared to other couples, but child's rights should be in question when finding a home and if there are several couples to choose from, I could imagine vegetarianism might give them the reason to favor the other possible parents-to-be.
Does the government decision mean they aren't allowed to any adopts at all?
I don't know how these things go. Were they evaluated as unsuitable parents in general - clearly deemed misfit due to vegetarianism - or were they compared to other candidates, lost this "competition", but might have a chance to adopt later, if other parent candidates are deemed less suitable based on some other criteria?
__________________
Life is...
|