Since I knew the position of the majority, I didn't read their opinion. I only read the dissent on this case, written by Justice Alito. I encourage each of you to read it also.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-751.pdf
When one reads the dissent, one realizes the extent to which these vermin intentionally targeted these parents. So, it was way more than a protest. It was an intentional infliction of abuse and distress. This case should have never been made out to be a "freedom of protest" case - because the actions of the defendants in this case went far beyond a protest. It seems Alito got that and the others did not. If the only thing they were doing was "protesting," I would have agreed with the verdict. This simply wasn't a SCOTUS case, in my opinion.