Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Another odd comment, ace. Try to focus, please.
Be that as it may, I for one, would vote for Lady Gaga for president over Palin, who unlike Gaga, is a paid political commentator and has suggested her interest in running.
|
It is not odd for those who have read what I have written in the past on the subject of Palin. Lady Gaga has made political comments and I don't take her comments seriously because she is a reflection of her audience and does not change political views. Palin does not change political views either, even when mcCain picked her, he did it to energize the "base" which see did. Liberals and independents have no need to fear Palin after the 2008 loss. To the degree you folks make a big deal out of her is your problem. I have said that repeatedly, sooner or later you folks will get the message. I thought Feb. was your turning point, I guess it wasn't. Viva, Palin
---------- Post added at 11:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
From the master of diversionary B.S. |
Thanks.
Quote:
|
But if you want to play that card, Obama's family had no more to do with the Mau Mau revolution in Kenya than Huckabee's family had to do with lynchings in the south in the 50s.
|
It is not possible to have been a living person in the South through the civil rights movement and not have had it shape in some material fashion one's current political views.
Yes, I would question Huckabee about his past regarding civil Rights and how his views were formed - including understanding the views of his parents and grand parents and how he reconciled with them. Bill Clinton had to address those issues and he did in a manner that allowed him to win 80% to 90% of the black vote.