Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Dude, read. I said "bureaucratic type person". If you don't think a doctor can be a bureaucratic type person, that is f'ing nuts. But i am going to assume you just misread what was written.
|
That's the problem with your random analogies, though. When you bring up ritalin as a problem because of over eager administrators and bureaucrats as a comparison to PP, it makes it seem like you aren't aware that bureaucrats aren't in charge of treatment at PP. You do know that they have licensed medical professionals, just like the folks at your doctor's office, right? It doesn't matter that they might act like bureaucrats sometimes. You probably act like a bureaucrat sometimes. Everybody probably acts like a bureaucrat sometimes in some vague sort of way.
I still think that your fears are misplaced. And that you've decided that this is an issue and no amount of talking will convince you otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
That is not productive. Raise a question or concern about PP = abortions in back allies. If you want to win the center understand that it includes the one or more deviations left of center and one or more deviation right of center - assuming the extremes are entrenched addressing legitimate issues and concerns is worth while - but the suggestion that I have no concern for the health of women who want abortion will cause resentment. You choose to offend a lot of people in your post.
 |
This is a fairly gross oversimplification of political ideology as it actual exists. I don't think that it's meaningful to model it as a univariate, normally distributed, random variable. On top of that, I like how this discussion has now morphed into one where the pro-PP folk are now tasked with convincing everyone who may not like PP to like PP via convincing you to like PP.
Apparently, you are public opinion on PP.