Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla
If companies had the unconditional right to hire replacement workers, then a strike might be fair. As it is, hiring replacement workers results in intimidation and harassment of the replacement workers far too many times.
|
The equivalent to a worker's right to strike is the lock out.
Also, employers already have the right to hire replacement workers. As for these instances of "intimidation and harassment," not only are they already covered by the law, but they are also far less common than management violations of workers' contracted rights.