Please understand, I'm trying to make sense of two things:
1) What is the voice of the 97%? You guys believe it is in chorus with the 3%. I can accept that, as you have better insight. rb-I do take stock in the logistics of it. Many policital movements have had silent partners - the underground railroad, the movement of jews out of Poland, etc. I don't believe the 3% is the sum total of those who want change, I'm just trying to understand why 3 on Tuesday wasn't 10 on Friday? I don't doubt the people's resolve, I just want to make certain I understand their choice to remain only logistically helpful - silent partners.
2) What was the motivation for the administration's reaction, was it simply numeric evaluation? That seems like something an American administration would do.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.
"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
|