|
If only the question were that simple. I support a policy which forces companies to reveal the ingredients, calories, and potential health consequences of ingestible products so that Americans can make an informed decision about what they put in their bodies (and their children's bodies). I oppose a policy which dictates what products a company can sell and what a person can consume. Now, all of this has the "within reason" caveat. I know we have reached the end of common sense when an American can sue a major corporation for putting a "toy" in a meal which is, in moderation, perfectly fit for consumption.
Frankly, I can't understand the position you take. You call the government's policy on smoking "fascism" but it's policy on food perfectly reasonable? What am I missing here?
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.
"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
|