Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Okay, here's a fact: Al Gore didn't put any cross-hairs on the Discovery Channel.
Also, if we were so hung up on facts, we'd also outline that Gore's call to action was about striving for clean energy rather than removing people from office using the imagery of cross-hairs.
And what about the novelist Daniel Quinn? Was he calling for removing people too?
|
You know... there's a whole chain of department stores with "targets" on them. Sounds mighty suspicious
meanwhile... August 10, 2010 - Al Gore speaking during a conference call with global warming activists:
Quote:
|
"I have a difficult task tonight,” Gore said. “I want to call you to action but I have to begin by telling you what you know, in all candor – the United States government in its entirety, largely because of the opposition in the United States Senate to taking action on clean energy and a solution to the climate crisis, has failed us.”
|
I don't know... with such an inflammatory statement, how many ways can
"call you to action" be interpreted by someone as far in the deep end as James Lee? Perhaps as "crosshairs"?
And yes, THANK YOU!!!... prompted by more of this contrived mob-logic you're promoting, we should also be charging Daniel Quinn (with murder), the author of "My Ishmael" which was featured in Lee's demands on the Discovery Channel. But wait!.... so are you now in agreement with the absurdity of associating acts of lone insane people to entire socio-political movements?
Where does this end? ... the rush to paint the actions of a lone nut-job as something political?
We know why it starts. It looks contrived because it is.
... I'm on my cell phone, could someone please post a Holy Grail
Burn the Witch! clip from YouTube?
BTW-Lee (absolutely) was a radical liberal environmentalist... who also happened to be a PSYCHOPATH! It doesn't that mean all radical liberal environmentalists are psychopaths and would act out in the same way as James Lee. But it doesn't seem to play well with the strategy of inventing and assigning non-existant violent tendendies to political foes.