The_Dunedan

Oh! Oh! I know! Since the "Palin Map" showed -states- with crosshairs, but a Democratic attack ad actually put crosshairs on a guy's head!? (Target: J.D. Hayworth (Rep.))
http://coaching.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...9785f26970b-pi
http://www.espressopundit.com/2010/0...targeting.html

Except that -is- how it works, and no, the Minutemen are not organizationally like the Tea Party. The Minutemen have/had a roster of members, a formalized leadership, etc. They were/are a distinct and organized group. So were Citizen's Border Patrol, etc. The two people known to have been responsible for that attack were thrown out of the Minutemen, formally and "for cause," because of their insistence on violence. They were the "INLA," if you like, to the Minuteman's OIRA; an extremely radicalized splinter movement that the original group which ejected them wanted nothing to do with. Stop trying to rewrite history.

No, he was not. We have had this discussion before, and you are wrong now as you were wrong then. Remember that whole "Zero Aggresson Principle," and how it's the defining characteristic of libertarianism?

Anarcho-Socialists, Anarcho-Syndicalists, various sorts of Georgist, any of these ring a bell?

Wait! I thought you said he was a libertarian? How can he possibly have been both? Do you even know what a populist -is-, and what positions they've taken in the past? I'll give you a starting point from my own native home, one Huey P. Long.

Because I see no need to expend energy defending the indefensible nor explaining the inexplicable. They were right-wing nutballs, case closed.

__________________
"I personally think that America's interests would be well served if after or at the time these clowns begin their revolting little hate crime the local police come in and cart them off on some trumped up charges or other. It is necessary in my opinion that America makes an example of them to the world."

--Strange Famous, advocating the use of falsified charges in order to shut people up.