One view would be that Mankind is neither good nor bad - it simply is. The question is predicated on the assumption of absolute morality, which I would argue we cannot assume due to the subjective nature of existence.
The behaviour of any entity is determined by both the composition of that entity and the composition of that which it is surrounded by. Therefore, things are only 'good' or 'bad' in the context of their circumstances.
I agree with Dragonlich, that man is neutral. Terms like 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' are merely conceptual devices through which we can more easily create sustainable order. The interesting question for me is whether mankind is inherently sustainable or not?!!
|