Quote:
Originally Posted by Nepenthes
When someone reports to the police that they know someone is looking for a hitman, the police setup a sting. People are convicted by making the deal with the undercover cop "hitman."
This is an example that I would use to explain the FBI's actions based on what I have read about this story. The guy was willing to commit an act of terror or horrific crime (depending on your political view) and was caught before it could take place.
I hope that the FBI/law enforcement continues to protect us in this way.
I'll vote "save us from terrorism."
|
this is a craptastic cowardly way of thinking. What the FBI did was find someone who THOUGHT an attack would be a good thing, but had no intention of finding a device to utilize until the FBI facilitated it.
If 'thought crimes' are your thing, then you're in the majority of the sheeple of this country.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|