I only read part one of the Assange essay. I thought the 'zunga' analysis written in context of the diplomacy leak to be more relevant.
Like you've said, I find myself to be much more interested in Wikileaks now that I've read these articles. It's not about whistle blowing, but about revolution. And a potentially peaceful one at that. I'm afraid I'd have to throw the full weight of my support behind that.
I think everyone should read them. I assume that alot of the concern, at least among reasonable people, is that with these leaks we are heading into unknown territory with unknown consequences. That fear, even if I don't accept it, is something that at least I can understand. But in reality, if we are going along not knowing whether what we see and hear - what we are told - is real or not, is that really so much of a different place to be? Myself, I prefer to know the truth.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
Last edited by mixedmedia; 12-01-2010 at 01:10 PM..
|