Baraka_Guru

Let's keep this in perspective. This isn't a thread simply about someone who wants to pay for sex. We've seen threads like that and they didn't turn out like this.

The OP made it clear---and even used an enumerated list---that he thinks prostitution is a preferred alternative to merciless interrogation from aggressively insulting, randomly sarcastic, manipulative, man-destroying baby-makers that treat men cruelly to test their compatibility and endurance for a relationship, which will invariably lead to tests of loyalty based on some form of mind-reading witchcraft, and that her trickery knows no bounds and will even go as far as to default men's behaviour as "dangerous" as a way to force him to prove otherwise with the result being his exposing his every secret whilst she reveal none of her own. This, being the natural state of women and their desire for baby-making man-enslavement---and this makes prostitution, of course, a kind of emancipation. Prostitution is emancipation itself.

Oh, and then the OP proceeded to attack the majority of responses not as opinions but as self-deceptions worthy of scorn if not ridicule.

There's a difference.

And I haven't even mentioned the blatant use of presumptions.

I should add, as a statement that summarizes my thoughts on this thread: this is one of those threads we get every so often that has the odd status of being simultaneously misogynist and misandric. I guess to that extent, it's misanthropic.

Levite's most recent post is enlightening on the matter.

__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot