on the other hand, if people in state are worried about what they do and say being made public, maybe it'd be better if they acted and spoke in ways that minimized the concern, yes?
no, you're right. better to be pissy about asange. way easier.
an aside: apparently at this point, about 2/3 of the fox viewership that's taken this poll
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/...-organization/
(whatever that means)
thinks that wikileaks is a "terrorist organization" which is defined as bad people who want to hurt the united of states (not much of a paraphrase, that).
just as in indicator of spin this is getting in reactionary-land.