Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
you can't torture someone and expect that the evidence you gather is admissible.
you can't torture people period.
|
If he was tortured they should have a trial of those responsible of the torture. But, he was not tortured. He was the enemy in a war and should have been treated as such and not given a civilian trial that would lead to a not guilty verdict.
---------- Post added at 09:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
ace, are you really trying this argument again?
how is it any different from that old line: "eat shit: a hundred million flies can't be wrong."
|
I don't argue morality. Morality is between you and your belief system. I argue that "show trials" have a purpose and that when they are conducted they need to go as planned. I doubt I am the only one who sees, understands and accepts this.
---------- Post added at 09:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:21 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent_jay
Where have I said you were a loon? I think that some of your opinions are out there, but no where have I said or agreed you were a loon, I understand human nature just fine ace, but I know you don't understand what a show trial is.....
|
The word was used in a earlier post describing people who share my view. It was presented to you in the form of a question, if I failed to use a question mark, my apology.