Thread: Pelosi
View Single Post
Old 11-15-2010, 03:17 PM   #122 (permalink)
filtherton
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
If it is raining, I don't check with a weatherman for him to tell me its raining. And if it is raining and he saz it ain't raining, I won't believe him. I don't care about his education, his scientific approach or whatever. That is how I live, call me what you will.
Right, well, in the context of your analogy, your refusal to use national poll results in favor of your own personal poll results is akin to looking outside your window to see what the weather is like in the rest of the nation.

Quote:
Also, on many of the polls there is a need to drill down. If a response is - its the economy. If you drill down with a follow-up you may find some real answers. Most polls in my view are superficial and are agenda driven. If you put blind faith in them - If I were you I would pause and reflect on that rather than attacking me.
Nobody should put blind faith in anything. However, you must realize that simply saying "I don't trust polls" isn't all that useful a response. Polls should be viewed critically based on objective criteria and one's best judgment. For instance, who funded the poll? Has the polling organization released the raw data? Have they released the questions used? Is their methodology sound? Is the sample representative of the population to which its results are inferred? How accurate have the polling organization's past polls been? Are there any recent events which might render these results obsolete? These are all good questions to ask.

There are a lot of ways that polls can be wrong, but to dismiss them all with a casual wave doesn't make sense if your goal is to understand how your fellow citizens feel about things. This is especially true when your alternative (a small sample of man on the street interviews?) is likely as -if not more- flawed than the polls you criticize. That is why I "attacked" you. Because you presented yourself as being above the trivial nonsense being peddled by pollsters while apparently failing to realize that your methods were likely as or less reliable.
filtherton is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360