Originally Posted by roachboy

fugly dear, i didn't write the article that appeared in rolling stone.
mike taibbi, who did write the piece, works in the "new journalism" style that's been "new" since hunter s. thompson pioneered it (in rolling stone).
the research is solid, the methodology folded into the piece.
your "objection" is basically that the style of writing doesn't appeal to your prudish sensibility.
then don't read it.
it's of no consequence to me, your "taste".