Quote:
Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth
There is when a massive chunk of that business sector is collapsing all at once and in turn that collapse will not only effect those with financial interests but everyone else around the globe as well. Regardless of how each company failed we can't just ignore the real world consequences in an attempt to adhere to a rigid theory about govt/economics because that's just the way it should be. No solution is right 100% of the time.
|
Look at the DOW companies 25/50/75/100 years ago. Look at the S&P 500 or the Fortune 500 over the same intervals. Come back and tell me if that changes your opinion.
---------- Post added at 08:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I'm beginning to think that maybe it's just that you aren't being entirely clear.
|
Yes, that is it. Like I said I wish I had the words to...
Quote:
"When the housing market rebounds" is the key phrase here.
|
We have seen these patterns repeated time and time. Nothing new to these cycles, in housing or in other markets.
Quote:
No, I expect investors, spenders, and a market for exchange, not just investors throwing good money after bad or playing high-risk games.
|
You are still in a theoretical plain. A professor at a university, who writes a book in his "garage" and it goes on to become a best seller and then he becomes a full-time writer and a filthy "rich" fat cat, employing a team including fact checkers, agent, publicist, consultants, etc., in my opinion did not play a game of "high-risk". To make this example more real, perhaps look at Stephan King.