Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla
I can find articles from economists who oppose the stimulus spending as well. I look at any article on the economy or other social issues coming out of Harvard as having a liberal bias unless definitively proven otherwise.
|
So in other words you refuse to believe any citations until someone proves to you they are not [s]a witch[/s] liberally biased? That sounds more like a case of insisting that because you disagree with it then it must be wrong.
Quote:
The government should not be meddling in the economy at all. Let supply and demand drive the market. Obama's meddling in the auto market and the housing market illustrate this. All Obama did was succeed in borrowing against future sales at taxpayer expense. As soon as cash for clunkers ended, sales of new cars dropped. As soon as Obama's homebuyer's tax credit ended, housing sales dropped.
|
Quote:
You should note that I wrote that if the Bush tax cuts were allowed to expire because reducing the debt is so important (which it is) then Obama's stimulus and health care plans should be rescinded for the same reason.
|
Or maybe we could stop blowing more on our military than the next two highest spenders combined and dismantle Bush Jr's Terrorist Mood Ring and be able to pay for all of this quite readily.