Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
Yes and yes... I can provide complete mirror inventory. I noticed you haven't answered the question.
|
Oh, I get it you make a quip about my "dismissive statement" and expected a serious response to yours.
Umm, ok...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
I don't believe I said Beck is always accurate.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
"the investigative accuracy and persistence from the likes of Beck and Andrew Breitbart. With their limited resources, they've produced some amazing investigative reporting"
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
He frequently admits they are not journalists and routinely begs for investigative reporters to look in to the things they uncover. He maintains an open challenge to prove him right or wrong on a topic. If wrong, he will lead with the correction. They also created a direct phone line for the White House to call with corrections.
|
So, according to you Beck has "investigative accuracy and persistence" but you never meant to imply he's always accurate? Yet you acknowledge that he himself states he's not a journalists. Sure that all makes sense. Now go ahead and break out Beck's caulk board logic and show me how these statements are compatible.
No wonder you like Beck your logic goes in as many, if not more, circles then his.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
your dismissive statement, it's evident that you have no first-hand basis for your opinion. Is it your intent to be inaccurate or are you just content with sources that are emotionally appealling?
|
How is my "first hand knowledge" any more or less lacking then yours? And seriously Beck's whole act is being emotionally appealing. Even brings him to tears on a occasion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
A lie requires the intent of deception.
|
This is nothing more then the old "yeah what he said wasn't true but he didn't really mean (or know) it was untrue defense, ergo no lie." It's a BS defense and if people used it to defend the likes of Micheal Moore I seriously doubt you'd believe it for one second.
You think he told people he checked and no other POTUS hadn't used an bible to take the oath of office accidentally? Or did he accidentally forget he didn't really check? Personally think his intent was to incite as many Christians as he could by inferring Obama is not like them, he's not a Christian and you should be fearful of him.