View Single Post
Old 09-12-2010, 05:46 AM   #59 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla View Post
Construction workers are heavily unionized, with unions as a major Democratic party backer
In this election cycle:
General Contractors - 61% contributions to Republicans

Special Trade Contractors - 63% contributions to Republicans

Building Materials and Equipment - 72$ contributions to Republicans


Quote:
Let the states fund it. The federal government funds way too many things that should be at the state level, and with a one size fits all approach that isn't necessary.
So you prefer a piecemeal approach...where smaller, poorer states will just have to live with the crumbling infrastructure that affects not only the state's economy, but the national economy as well.


Quote:
9%+ unemployment, housing and auto sales down after Obama borrowed against futirs sailes with his stupid programs, consumer spending down, foreclosures up. Some recovery.
So you dont think five -six quarters of positive GDP growth (ave 3+%) is a good thing? or a positive result of the government's action? Or that unemployment would have likely been even higher (as much as 2-3%) than the current 9+%.

All sectors do not recovery at once and employment is always the last to recover.

Oh and consumer spending has been going up in the last 12-18 months...not down.

Quote:
Yes. Eventually it will recover.
Eventually?

Sure the economy would have recovered eventually?

At what cost? How many more unemployed would have been acceptable? How many more quarters of negative GDP growth would have been acceptable?
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 09-12-2010 at 06:12 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46