Quote:
Originally Posted by chriswin8
In my third explanation what i was saying is at this stage. We as the human race "may" be like the Caveman when it comes to thinking about Magic. [...]
It all boils down to perception and what you want to believe.
|
This is what I thought you meant. What you're saying, then, is that some of what we think to be supernatural is actually not the case. I guess one example would be telepathy. Let's say 50 years down the road, neuroscientists figure out a way to "unblock" telepathic channels in our brains that are naturally underdeveloped because of our current place along our evolutionary adaptation.
Assuming (for the sake of argument) that telepathy is real, what this means is that we are currently "cavemen" but 50 years down the road, telepathy will be as real as dreaming or meditation. The "supernatural" has become understood to be natural.
Yet, if telepathy remains elusive in terms of being able to prove its effectiveness, then it will remain to be considered a supernatural ability.
I'm still not 100% sure if this is what you're getting at. Is it?