Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414
|
Here's what happened after the document was fact-checked:
Quote:
|
U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a "neutron initiator" for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication, according to a former Central Intelligence Agency official.
|
source
The document is a fake and has been known to be so for quite a while now. I wonder why a Murdoch news source would post such an inflammatory, controversial piece of information without first verifying it? Could it be because Murdoch-owned news outlets are trying to create a narrative instead of simply deliver the news? Did I just ask a question with a clear accusation in it, but framed it as a question so as to make it seem as if I'm asking the audience's opinion instead of what I'm actually doing, which is informing said opinions? Who else do we know that does that? Could it be Fox News? Did Glenn Beck rape and murder a little girl in 1990?
So, still, all we need is a shred of (reliable and/or verifiable) evidence. Just a shred. That's all I've ever asked for